Monday 7 January 2013

Winter extremes and natural variability

So far I’ve looked at patterns of precipitation and temperature, and also related drought, determined by natural modes of variability. Is there also a connection with snow anomalies and extreme winters? Yes, of course there is.

The winter of 2009/10 had anomalously large snowfall in the central parts of the US and in northwestern Europe, which some of you may remember. December’s snowcover in the contiguous US was the greatest ever for that month and Washington D.C. had to be closed down for a weak.

Washington D.C., December 19, 2009. Here


As mentioned in the beginning of this blog, the NAO exerts a strong influence on wintertime climate across the North Atlantic basin, and a negative index NAO give cold temperature anomalies in the eastern US and northern Europe. ENSO, with its warm phase El Niño, also influences wintertime climate over the US by a southward displaced stormtrack. A paper by Seageret al. (2010) takes a closer look at the winter of 2009/10 and finds that a combination of a negative NAO and an El Niño event was causing the cold temperatures and the anomalous amounts of snow experienced in parts of the US and Europe that winter. The changes in storminess associated with El Niño explained snow anomalies in western, central and southern US, while the negative NAO provided sufficient cold air for the precipitation to fall as snow in the northeastern US and northern Europe.
In a study published in Science in 2001, Thomson and Wallace find that the different phases of the NAO (NAM, see link) are marked by distinct differences in the frequency distribution of significant weather events in the Northern Hemisphere that impact human activities. They report that cold events (daily minimum temperatures dropping below a specified threshold, frozen precipitation) occur with much greater frequency over North America and Europe (and other places, see table below) during negative index days, increasing the risk of frost damage and the frequency of snowfall.

Significant weather events associated with high and low NAM index days. As you can see most of the events occur with much higher frequency during NAM- (negative index). 

So heavy snowfall events and extreme winters, like the winter of 2009/10, are also influenced, to a big extent, by natural modes of variability. But is there a relation to climate change? If one is thinking about climate change in general, I think most people will relate it to warming. The winter of 2009/10 made people really question climate change. I’ll be discussing whether or not winter extremes are related to anthropogenic climate change in my next post.

3 comments:

  1. March 2013 will presumably be registered as a weather extreme. Whether human activities in the North- and Baltic Sea have contributed would be known today, if other extreme March months had been investigated a long time ago, as there are particularly March 1942 and March 1917, each happen in the third year of the two world wars, see about the ranking in Berlin, Copenhagen, Stockholm etc: http://climate-ocean.com/2013/10_2.html
    It is also to note that Met-Off puts March 1916 and March 1917 on rank 4 & 5. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2013/cold-march-statistics
    Regards

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Emilie,
    Could the extreme cold spring 2013 be a blessing for „extreme weather research“ ??
    Is it only natural variability or with some human input??? Information and discussion here:
    11. April 2013: 'Urgent' need to see if Arctic affects UK extreme cold? No! MetOffice should investigate the impact of human activities in the North- and Baltic Sea ! (co_9-4)
    03 April 2013: Did the cold March 2013 came from Siberia ? A not well founded claim! (ocl_9-9)
    29 March 2013: Cold March 2013 in company with March 1942 & 1917 (co 10-2)
    27. March 2013: Strong Start – Strong Ending; Winter 2012/13. About the Role of North- and Baltic Sea (2007seatraining 1310)
    With kind regards AB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Access to the topic:
      http://climate-ocean.com/2013/9_4.html
      http://climate-ocean.com/2013/10_2.html
      http://www.ocean-climate-law.com/13/Arch/9_9.html

      Delete