The winter of 2009/10 had anomalously large snowfall in the central parts of the US and in northwestern Europe, which some of you may remember. December’s snowcover in the contiguous US was the greatest ever for that month and Washington D.C. had to be closed down for a weak.
Washington D.C., December 19, 2009. Here
As mentioned in the beginning of this blog, the NAO exerts a
strong influence on wintertime climate across the North Atlantic basin, and a
negative index NAO give cold temperature anomalies in the eastern US and
northern Europe. ENSO, with its warm phase El Niño, also influences wintertime
climate over the US by a southward displaced stormtrack. A paper by Seageret al. (2010) takes a closer look at the winter of 2009/10 and finds that a
combination of a negative NAO and an El Niño event was causing the cold temperatures
and the anomalous amounts of snow experienced in parts of the US and Europe
that winter. The changes in storminess associated with El Niño explained snow
anomalies in western, central and southern US, while the negative NAO provided
sufficient cold air for the precipitation to fall as snow in the northeastern
US and northern Europe.
In a study published in Science in 2001, Thomson and
Wallace find that the different phases of the NAO (NAM, see link) are marked by distinct differences in the frequency
distribution of significant weather events in the Northern Hemisphere that
impact human activities. They report that cold events (daily minimum
temperatures dropping below a specified threshold, frozen precipitation) occur
with much greater frequency over North America and Europe (and other places, see table below) during negative index days,
increasing the risk of frost damage and the frequency of snowfall.
Significant weather events associated with high and low NAM index days. As you can see most of the events occur with much higher frequency during NAM- (negative index).
March 2013 will presumably be registered as a weather extreme. Whether human activities in the North- and Baltic Sea have contributed would be known today, if other extreme March months had been investigated a long time ago, as there are particularly March 1942 and March 1917, each happen in the third year of the two world wars, see about the ranking in Berlin, Copenhagen, Stockholm etc: http://climate-ocean.com/2013/10_2.html
ReplyDeleteIt is also to note that Met-Off puts March 1916 and March 1917 on rank 4 & 5. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2013/cold-march-statistics
Regards
Hi Emilie,
ReplyDeleteCould the extreme cold spring 2013 be a blessing for „extreme weather research“ ??
Is it only natural variability or with some human input??? Information and discussion here:
11. April 2013: 'Urgent' need to see if Arctic affects UK extreme cold? No! MetOffice should investigate the impact of human activities in the North- and Baltic Sea ! (co_9-4)
03 April 2013: Did the cold March 2013 came from Siberia ? A not well founded claim! (ocl_9-9)
29 March 2013: Cold March 2013 in company with March 1942 & 1917 (co 10-2)
27. March 2013: Strong Start – Strong Ending; Winter 2012/13. About the Role of North- and Baltic Sea (2007seatraining 1310)
With kind regards AB
Access to the topic:
Deletehttp://climate-ocean.com/2013/9_4.html
http://climate-ocean.com/2013/10_2.html
http://www.ocean-climate-law.com/13/Arch/9_9.html